Fahrenheit 9/11

I'm not a conservative or liberal and I am definitely not a George Bush fan..can't stand him.

Fahrenheit 9/11 is the most controversial documentary ever made. Michael Moore's film, which is the highest grossing documentary ever, is an extremely one sided attack on the Bush administration, specifically on their handling of the War on Terror post-9/11 and the Iraq invasion.

Ce "documentaire" à la Michael Moore, c'est-à-dire un cocktail d'investigation, de provocation, d'intuition, d'humour ravageur et d'auto-promotion, "Fahrenheit 9/11" a beaucoup frappé en 2004, soit un peu moins de trois ans après les événements tragiques du 11 septembre, d'autant que la fibre patriotique des Américains vibrait encore et que le soutien à Bush était encore prioritaire. Et il est vrai que, même si "Fahrenheit 9/11" peut parfois irriter par certains de ses aspects, c'est un film important qui soulève de graves questions : comment a-t-on pu laisser ces attentats se produire ?

I watched this documentary along with its counterpart (which not many people know about), "Fahrenhype 911". Watching these documentaries was part of an English class I took on argumentative writing back before the Bush/Kerry election.

Yes, this documentary is biased, and one side, and I don't entirely agree with Michael Moore's politics, but the Bush administration was corrupt and that's a fact. So what if it's a biased documentary?

I was up EXTRA early on 9/11/2001 to get the NEWEST results from Florida's several ongoing recounts and instead I got to see the second (World Trade) tower hit (LIVE)... and meanwhile, Bush was deep down (safe) in Florida.

A very good idea for a movie. However, the writing and imagery is childish and poorly executed.

I watched 9/11 the other day and i think it is an interesting film. I have noticed that a lot of the comments are from the USA.

How could any rational, sensible, educated, Christian person support George W. Bush?